Skip to content

Addressing the Ben 10 Reboot Part 3: Show/Episode Discussions

Locked Ben 10 Reboot
1.0k 24 1.0m 22
  • Am i the only one who saw michael morningstar in the begining of the video

    @JrPhilgene I saw it too. Maybe that's Michael Morningstar. Not entirely sure.

  • Well if it is Michael we at least gets a more serious villain. Its weird that Frightwig is a kid, but I think Im just got to get used to it.

  • As far as I know the show of the new series a reboot in the Netherlands was supposed to start today ?

  • What Ben 10 Reboot episode the evil Dr. Animo will appeared in? I like to see a new clips Ben 10 Reboot episodes real soon especially on YouTube.com

  • 0_1486387638978_Michael_Morningstar_in_the_reboot_3.png

    A picture of Michael's human form in the reboot. Honestly, I like it more than his UAF design. And he got slightly more details for his design compared to the background characters.

  • I think the voice actor of Michael morningstar in the reboot is Drake bell. he is also the voice actor of spider man from ultimate spiderman

  • Michael Morningstar absorbs people's admiration of him and he's just an attention seeker? Any other villains they want to discredit, undermine, and screw up on?

  • Holy crap, they really did get bring him into this.
    I'm... I'm very surprised.... just wow.... and they even established how Gwen even cared about him at first.
    Maybe this will shed some light into debuting Darkstar later down the road.

  • Can't wait to see new episodes of Ben 10 Reboot next week when it's aired on Cartoon Network. Including new clips featuring Dr. Animo and Frightwig soon.

  • Wow that episode looks pretty good. A formidable villian. Micheal is. Maybe the fact that gwen is fighting back is a forshadowing of her anodite abilities.

  • Wow that episode looks pretty good. A formidable villian. Micheal is. Maybe the fact that gwen is fighting back is a forshadowing of her anodite abilities.

    @Omni-Triforcer She fought back by not admiring him. That's not a sign of her powers. That's something that a normal human being could do. How did you miss that in the preview?

  • So, we get a blatant attention seeker that gets more powerful through more people admiring him over a sadistic, manipulative, seductive, vampire-type villain that gets more powerful through absorbing actual life energy from living beings. Wonderful, it's like the other long time villains from the past shows being put into this reboot only to be undermined and discredited and no longer being the good/great villains that they once were.

  • So, we get a blatant attention seeker that gets more powerful through more people admiring him over a sadistic, manipulative, seductive, vampire-type villain that gets more powerful through absorbing actual life energy from living beings. Wonderful, it's like the other long time villains from the past shows being put into this reboot only to be undermined and discredited and no longer being the good/great villains that they once were.

    @Tactical-Ochoa o I understand you don't like the reboot, it's kinda getting old hearing your negative opinions, I'm not to fond of the reboot, but have some faith that Ben 10 will be great again.

  • @Tactical-Ochoa o I understand you don't like the reboot, it's kinda getting old hearing your negative opinions, I'm not to fond of the reboot, but have some faith that Ben 10 will be great again.

    @Rexfan1333 Why do you think I plan on trying to have PlatinumGames make a Ben 10 game in the future? I'm not just hoping that Ben 10 will be great again. I'm trying to make that happen.

  • @Rexfan1333 Why do you think I plan on trying to have PlatinumGames make a Ben 10 game in the future? I'm not just hoping that Ben 10 will be great again. I'm trying to make that happen.

    @Tactical-Ochoa The problem is CN will probably not let that happen (hoping they will find it a little interesting), which sucks because I would love a awesome Ben 10 video game as well as a way better reboot with Teen Ben instead.

  • @Tactical-Ochoa The problem is CN will probably not let that happen (hoping they will find it a little interesting), which sucks because I would love a awesome Ben 10 video game as well as a way better reboot with Teen Ben instead.

    @Rexfan1333 That doesn't mean I can't try. Considering how big the gaming industry is, CN would be making quite a big mistake not having a company like PlatinumGames make a Ben 10 game.

  • @Rexfan1333 That doesn't mean I can't try. Considering how big the gaming industry is, CN would be making quite a big mistake not having a company like PlatinumGames make a Ben 10 game.

    @Tactical-Ochoa said in Addressing the Ben 10 Reboot Part 3: Show/Episode Discussions:

    @Rexfan1333 That doesn't mean I can't try. Considering how big the gaming industry is, CN would be making quite a big mistake not having a company like PlatinumGames make a Ben 10 game.

    You realize even if they do agree to make a ben 10 game it wouldnt be the way you want it right? CN would want to make big changes and one of those changes would most likely be making it be more in line with the reboot so they can promote it. Why would they promote a dead show when they have a alive show using the same concept?

  • @Tactical-Ochoa said in Addressing the Ben 10 Reboot Part 3: Show/Episode Discussions:

    @Rexfan1333 That doesn't mean I can't try. Considering how big the gaming industry is, CN would be making quite a big mistake not having a company like PlatinumGames make a Ben 10 game.

    You realize even if they do agree to make a ben 10 game it wouldnt be the way you want it right? CN would want to make big changes and one of those changes would most likely be making it be more in line with the reboot so they can promote it. Why would they promote a dead show when they have a alive show using the same concept?

    @Omni-Triforcer Even though Cartoon Network currently owns Ben 10, they're not working with people like CN Studios and Little Orbit and anyone that's new. This is PlatinumGames, a company devoted to making good quality games. It's more likely that Cartoon Network's going to have a much tougher time getting what they want from a video game company as big as PlatinumGames. Just check out Hideki Kamiya, one of the founders of PlatinumGames, on Twitter. The guy doesn't take bullshit. If Cartoon Network wants their way with Ben 10, it's more likely that they're really going to have to fight for it. Hell, PlatinumGames made Transformers: Devastation. You'd think they would make a Transformers game centered around the live-action films, right? No. They went for a Transformers game based on the original 1980s TV series. If PlatinumGames is willing and able to make a good and successful Transformers game based off an 80s TV series with Activision being the publishers (Activision is famous for being one of the most scummy game publishing companies out there), then they can make a Ben 10 video game based on elements of the Original Series.

    Also, do you even remember what I'm going for for a Ben 10 game. Open-world or linear, it's going to take a while to make a video game. This is on par of a AAA developed video game. With the Ben 10 game that I'm going for, it can take a good 2-4 years to fully develop and produce it. With the low reception and negative response that the Ben 10 reboot is getting and with a strong likelihood that the toy line isn't going to do well enough considering how Ultimate Alien and Omniverse's toy line did so poorly in sales, the Ben 10 reboot is most likely only going to last one to two seasons. Even then, each Ben 10 show lasts for a good 2-3 years. By the time the game is finished, the Ben 10 reboot would've most likely already ended or been cancelled. Why would Cartoon Network want PlatinumGames to make a Ben 10 game that promotes the Ben 10 reboot if by the time the game is finished, the Ben 10 reboot would most likely have already ended or been cancelled? Even then, like I said, PlatinumGames isn't going to be as easy for Cartoon Network to push around because they're PlatinumGames; not Cartoon Network Studios.

  • @Omni-Triforcer Even though Cartoon Network currently owns Ben 10, they're not working with people like CN Studios and Little Orbit and anyone that's new. This is PlatinumGames, a company devoted to making good quality games. It's more likely that Cartoon Network's going to have a much tougher time getting what they want from a video game company as big as PlatinumGames. Just check out Hideki Kamiya, one of the founders of PlatinumGames, on Twitter. The guy doesn't take bullshit. If Cartoon Network wants their way with Ben 10, it's more likely that they're really going to have to fight for it. Hell, PlatinumGames made Transformers: Devastation. You'd think they would make a Transformers game centered around the live-action films, right? No. They went for a Transformers game based on the original 1980s TV series. If PlatinumGames is willing and able to make a good and successful Transformers game based off an 80s TV series with Activision being the publishers (Activision is famous for being one of the most scummy game publishing companies out there), then they can make a Ben 10 video game based on elements of the Original Series.

    Also, do you even remember what I'm going for for a Ben 10 game. Open-world or linear, it's going to take a while to make a video game. This is on par of a AAA developed video game. With the Ben 10 game that I'm going for, it can take a good 2-4 years to fully develop and produce it. With the low reception and negative response that the Ben 10 reboot is getting and with a strong likelihood that the toy line isn't going to do well enough considering how Ultimate Alien and Omniverse's toy line did so poorly in sales, the Ben 10 reboot is most likely only going to last one to two seasons. Even then, each Ben 10 show lasts for a good 2-3 years. By the time the game is finished, the Ben 10 reboot would've most likely already ended or been cancelled. Why would Cartoon Network want PlatinumGames to make a Ben 10 game that promotes the Ben 10 reboot if by the time the game is finished, the Ben 10 reboot would most likely have already ended or been cancelled? Even then, like I said, PlatinumGames isn't going to be as easy for Cartoon Network to push around because they're PlatinumGames; not Cartoon Network Studios.

    @Tactical-Ochoa I honestly like to see a Teen Ben video game instead of it being based on the original series, it could have the same style and themes, but it could have darker ones as well. I just honestly like Teen Ben better and would be a cool way to reboot it.

  • Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: The Charm Offensive

    Ben 10 Reboot
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    Tactical OchoaT
    @csgt I do agree with you on Charmcaster's UAF design. Granted, as shown in the quote that you're using to respond to, that's not the point that I'm addressing here. I'm not stating that Charmcaster's UAF design looks unique overall. I'm stating that it looks better and more unique than Charmcaster's reboot design. Even though her UAF design isn't really unique on its own, is most certainly not a design that I like and favor, and doesn't even hold a candle to Charmcaster's OS design, it is a better and more visually unique design when compared to Charmcaster's reboot design, which, again, looks very much like a typical and generic Goth girl. Considering how they've handled the Ben 10 reboot so far, I doubt that they're going to make a connection between Hex and Charmcaster in the reboot. Her first name being Hope and the concept of Ledgerdomain itself are pretty much the only things related to Charmcaster in UAF that I liked. Ledgerdomain does have some nice potential and Hope sounds pretty ironic considering what Charmcaster went through with Hex before the events of the Original Series. Everything else with Charmcaster in UAF is stuff that I don't like. I most especially don't like how they handled her relationship with Hex in UAF though given that it very much conflicts with what was established with them in the OS. Granted, you do make a good point. Charmcaster, and Hex, were terribly handled and written in the sequel shows. However, when it came down to Charmcaster as a character, I really only compared the reboot Charmcaster to the OS Charmcaster because yeah, Charmcaster went through a pretty severe downgrade in the sequel shows and Charmcaster was at her best in the OS. I do have an interest in making an article about Charmcaster and analyzing her as a character, much like how I did with other characters such as Julie Yamamoto and Professor Paradox. I know for sure that this Charmcaster article is going to address the points about her in UAF that you made here.
  • Ben 10 Reboot season 3 speculation

    Ben 10 Reboot
    7
    2
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    4k Views
    GoodVibes1999G
    These are really nice-looking drawings! I like it.
  • Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: Something I Ate

    Moved Ben 10 Reboot
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Addressing the Ben 10 Reboot Part 2

    Locked Ben 10 Reboot
    568
    0 Votes
    568 Posts
    499k Views
    Tactical OchoaT
    @Ebomnitrix And there's your episodes folks. I'm going to make a part 3 to Addressing the Ben 10 Reboot. Part 2 is already going on for long enough now and I plan on having part 3 be made specifically to discuss and comment on the episodes of the Ben 10 reboot. Here is the link to part 3. http://ben10club.org/topic/181/addressing-the-ben-10-reboot-part-3
  • Addressing the Ben 10 Reboot

    Locked Ben 10 Reboot
    150
    1 Votes
    150 Posts
    278k Views
    Ultimate OmniTriU
    I split the topic and moved it to Ben 10 reboot section. http://ben10club.org/topic/121/addressing-the-ben-10-reboot-which-is-actually-a-remake-and-not-a-reboot/3 I am now locking this topic.