Skip to content

Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: Bright Lights, Black Hearts

Ben 10 Reboot
1 1 1.6k 1
  • Oh. Wonderful. We really need to be reminded of the Twilight series in this episode, don't we, Cartoon Network and Man of Action?

    This is the episode that debuts Michael Morningstar. Yeah, that's right. That villain from Alien Force that was pretty brilliantly well implemented especially in his very first appearance. In this episode, the main characters go to visit a film set. Gwen is a big fan of Michael Morningstar. Michael Morningstar turns out to be an energy vampire that feeds off of people's admiration of him. Ben and Gwen such his attention away, weakening him to the point where Ben was easily able to defeat him. The end. Once again, more of the same.

    Let's focus on Michael Morningstar. What made him such a great villain in Alien Force was just how manipulative and seductive he was. He was a lot like a predator, taking advantage of others in order to get the power that he wants. I find Michael Morningstar to be at his best in the very first episode that he appeared in because it showed just the type of villain that he was. He was quite a scary and intimidating villain and proved to be very dangerous to the main characters. In the reboot, all of that is gone. What made Michael Morningstar at his best was thrown out the window for him in the reboot because "oh, that is just too dark for our viewers. We have to stick to standards and practices. We don't want to poison children's minds now, do we? NO no No No no." Folks, let me just state this. Taking things away is not innovation and improvement. It's the opposite; especially if you're going to take away the best aspects of a certain element. Even then, if you're going to take certain elements and characteristics out of a show, movie, game, character, etc., replace it with something else. Give us something else. But oh way, they did give us something else about Morningstar, right? If so, that is him being a typical, generic, and bland attention getter. Yeah, I'm not fond of this.

    Let's get to the other aspect about Michael Morningstar that also undermines him as a villain and that's his powers. Like I said before, Michael Morningstar feeds off of people's admiration of him...and that is the only way in which he absorbs more energy. In the previous shows, he can just simply use his powers to absorb energy from other beings and that's it. He doesn't have to do something so specific in order to get the energy that he needs. In the reboot, however, because Morningstar needs to get people to admire him in order to absorb energy from him, it makes him less of a threat because all Ben needs to do is just get all that admiration and attention away from him...or maybe even find an isolated location to fight him in so that Morningstar isn't able to get more energy from others. This episode clearly showcases the problem with his powers. It clearly shows why Michael Morningstar is less dangerous and challenging to the main characters.

    Yeah, I don't like this episode. This is a terrible way to implement a villain such as Michael Morningstar. They didn't innovate and improve him. They took away some of the best aspects about him and made his powers too easily exploitable to make him a suitable challenge for the main characters.

    On another note, apparently, Michael Morningstar has been around for centuries in this reboot. Ok then.

  • Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: The Charm Offensive

    Ben 10 Reboot
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    Tactical OchoaT
    @csgt I do agree with you on Charmcaster's UAF design. Granted, as shown in the quote that you're using to respond to, that's not the point that I'm addressing here. I'm not stating that Charmcaster's UAF design looks unique overall. I'm stating that it looks better and more unique than Charmcaster's reboot design. Even though her UAF design isn't really unique on its own, is most certainly not a design that I like and favor, and doesn't even hold a candle to Charmcaster's OS design, it is a better and more visually unique design when compared to Charmcaster's reboot design, which, again, looks very much like a typical and generic Goth girl. Considering how they've handled the Ben 10 reboot so far, I doubt that they're going to make a connection between Hex and Charmcaster in the reboot. Her first name being Hope and the concept of Ledgerdomain itself are pretty much the only things related to Charmcaster in UAF that I liked. Ledgerdomain does have some nice potential and Hope sounds pretty ironic considering what Charmcaster went through with Hex before the events of the Original Series. Everything else with Charmcaster in UAF is stuff that I don't like. I most especially don't like how they handled her relationship with Hex in UAF though given that it very much conflicts with what was established with them in the OS. Granted, you do make a good point. Charmcaster, and Hex, were terribly handled and written in the sequel shows. However, when it came down to Charmcaster as a character, I really only compared the reboot Charmcaster to the OS Charmcaster because yeah, Charmcaster went through a pretty severe downgrade in the sequel shows and Charmcaster was at her best in the OS. I do have an interest in making an article about Charmcaster and analyzing her as a character, much like how I did with other characters such as Julie Yamamoto and Professor Paradox. I know for sure that this Charmcaster article is going to address the points about her in UAF that you made here.
  • Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: Story, Bored

    Ben 10 Reboot
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: Need for Speed

    Ben 10 Reboot
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: Growing Pains

    Ben 10 Reboot
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Ben 10 2016 Reboot Episode Review: Animo Farm

    Moved Ben 10 Reboot
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied